History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bodie v. . Horn
211 N.C. 397
N.C.
1937
Check Treatment

Civil action to recover balance alleged to be due on certain "cotton contracts" purchased by plaintiff from defendant "on call" and "closed out" when plaintiff failed to "put up sufficient margin to protect said contracts."

Demurrer interposed on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Demurrer sustained. Plaintiff appeals. The basis of the judgment is that the transactions alleged in the complaint are denominated "futures," no actual delivery of the articles sold being intended or contemplated, and therefore declared illegal by C. S., 2144. Orvis Bros. Co. v. Holt-Morgan Mills, 173 N.C. 231,91 S.E. 948. It is also observed that the complaint contains no allegation of a promise to pay on the part of the defendant, which, perhaps, the plaintiff assumed the law would imply. However, in all events, the judgment sustaining the demurrer would seem to be correct.

Affirmed. *Page 398

Case Details

Case Name: Bodie v. . Horn
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 17, 1937
Citation: 211 N.C. 397
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.