197 Wis. 356 | Wis. | 1928
In his answer the defendant denied that he was the owner of the Hudson automobile, denied that it was being operated by his chauffeur; admitted that he was an occupant of the automobile, but alleged that he was in no manner responsible for the acts of the driver. We find it necessary to consider only the question raised by these allegations in the answer.
The plaintiff having failed to establish that the defendant was the owner of or responsible for the movements of the automobile at the time in question, judgment must be reversed, with directions to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint.
By the Court, — It is so ordered,