History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bodana v. Brinkley
614 So. 2d 981
Ala.
1992
Check Treatment

Anji Reddy Bodana brought an action alleging legal malpractice against J. Allen Brinkley, Robert H. Ford, Richard E. Chestnut, and Daniel F. Aldridge (hereinafter "the attorneys"). The attorneys moved for a summary judgment; the trial court granted the motion. Bodana appeals, prose.

The attorneys supported their motion for summary judgment with an affidavit from Brinkley, as an expert; his affidavit stated that the attorneys had performed legal services for Bodana according to the standards of skill and diligence required of attorneys in the Madison County area. Bodana offered no affidavit or deposition of an expert with his response to the attorneys' motion for summary judgment. For a plaintiff in a legal malpractice action to defeat a motion for summary judgment filed by the attorney and supported by an expert's affidavit, the plaintiff must "come forward withexpert testimony to show negligence on the part of the attorney." See Phillips v. Alonzo, 435 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Ala.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 984, 104 S.Ct. 430,78 L.Ed.2d 363 (1983). Because Bodana failed to file an expert's affidavit, we affirm on the authority of Phillips, supra;Tidwell v. Waldrop, 554 So.2d 1009, 1010 (Ala. 1989); and Ricev. Hartman, Fawal Spina, 582 So.2d 464 (Ala. 1991).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ADAMS, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. *Page 982

Case Details

Case Name: Bodana v. Brinkley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 6, 1992
Citation: 614 So. 2d 981
Docket Number: 1911450
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.