84 Mo. 56 | Mo. | 1884
It was held in this case by the St. Louis court of appeals, that a cause of action, accruing to a bank against its cashier for wrongfully permitting an overdraft, arises on contract within the meaning of the statute relating to counter-claims; and that the pendency of a suit by the bank against the cashier for this breach of his bond does not affect the bank’s right to set up the overdraft as a counter-claim to a demand claimed by the cashier’s assignee against the bank, and that a counter-claim may be made to a claim by the debtor’s
The opinion is reported in 12 Mo. App. p. 104.