Board of Managers of the Netherlands Condominium, Respondent, v Mildred Trencher, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
9 NYS3d 213
Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Richter and Gische, JJ.
In this action, plaintiff seeks to foreclose on a lien for outstanding common charges and fees allegedly owed by defendant. The bylaws of the condominium do not provide for the charging of late fees for unpaid common charges. When reading the bylaws as a whole (see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]), it is clear that section 2.2-2.8 does not provide plaintiff with the authority to charge defendant for such fees. Section 6.4 is the only section that provides such authority, and that section was left blank with respect to the amount of those fees. Nor was section 6.4 properly amended to provide for such amounts. Pursuant to section 13.1 of the bylaws, an amendment can only be accomplished by an affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of all unit owners, and it is undisputed that no vote took place.
Pursuant to 6.4 of the by-laws, plaintiff can recover legal fees incurred in any proceeding to collect unpaid common charges or in an action to foreclose on a lien arising from unpaid common charges. Since the underlying action to foreclose the lien has not yet been fully resolved, the motion court properly denied any summary relief on this issue.
In support of her motion for summary judgment, defendant demonstrated only that she had satisfied the specific amount
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Richter and Gische, JJ.
