History
  • No items yet
midpage
Board of Education v. Bloomfield Education Ass'n
126 N.J. 300
| N.J. | 1991
|
Check Treatment
126 N.J. 300 (1991)
598 A.2d 517

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BLOOMFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 11, 1991.
Decided October 8, 1991.

Nathanya G. Simon argued the cause for appellant (Schwartz, Pisano, Simon & Edelstein, attorneys).

Kenneth I. Nowak argued the cause for respondent (Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella & Nowak, attorneys).

Donna M. Kaye argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association (Michael F. Kaelber, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 251 N.J. Super. 379, 598 A.2d 518 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Wilentz and Justices Clifford, Handler, Pollock, O'Hern, Garibaldi, and Stein. — 7

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Board of Education v. Bloomfield Education Ass'n
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 8, 1991
Citation: 126 N.J. 300
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.