107 Ind. 584 | Ind. | 1886
In this case the questions for our decision are fairly presented, as well for the appellant as for the appellee, by the following error assigned by appellant, in general term of the court below, namely: That the court, at special term, erred in its conclusion of law upon the facts found.
At. appellant’s request the court made a special finding of the facts of this case, in substance, as follows:
I. At the election for township officers, held in April, 1886, there became due to the several officers of the election boards, for their services as such, the aggregate sum of $1,386.
2. Meals were furnished to such election boards at an aggregate expense of $315.
3. An expense on account of renting rooms, in which to hold such elections, was incurred, amounting to the sum of $315.
4. Stationery, other than' the stationery required to be furnished by the county auditor, was furnished by the township trustee, amounting to $10.50.
5. The ballot-boxes were repaired and delivered to the various polling-places at an expense of $68.70.
6. Certain of the ballot-boxes were sent for by the board of canvassers at an expense of $6. '
7. There was an expense in hauling chutes to the polling-places of $25.
The court at special tifrm stated, as its conclusion of law upon the foregoing facts, that the plaintilf, Center township, was entitled to recover of the defendant, the board of commissioners, etc., the sqm of $2,126.20, being the aggregate amount of the expenses of the April election, 1886, in Center township, as found by the court.
Under our government and laws, elections must be held at stated times, and, of course, all necessary expenses, incurred in holding such elections, must be borne and paid out of public funds. It is not claimed in the case in hand, that the expenses of the April election, 1886, or any part thereof, were' improper or unnecessary. But the appellee insists that all the expenses incurred, growing out of such election, were ‘ payable, under the law, out of the county funds, and that Center township, having paid the amount of such expenses, has a valid claim against appellant for reimbursement out of the funds of the county. The trial court adopted the views of the appellee, on the question in controversy, and rendered judgment in its favor against appellant for the full amount of the expenses of such election, and this judgment was-affirmed by the court in general term.
It would seem to be clear, that all the expenses incident, to a general election must be borne and paid by the proper county board out of the proper county treasury. The statute concerning elections, etc., in force since September 19th, 1881, provides for the holding of an election in each township of each county in the State, on the first Monday of April, 1882, and every second year thereafter, for the purpose of electing certain officers for the township. Of course,, it would have been competent for the Legislature to have provided that the expenses of such election should be borne-
Construing together all the provisions of the statute concerning elections, which are applicable to all elections alike, we are of opinion that.it was the intention of the Legislature, in the enactment of such statute, that the necessary expenses of all elections, township as well as general, should be borne and paid by the proper county board, out of the funds of such county. 'Wo have found no error in the record of this cause which authorizes or requires the reversal of the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.