History
  • No items yet
midpage
BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.
835 So. 2d 1211
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2003
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant’s amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case Details

Case Name: BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 15, 2003
Citation: 835 So. 2d 1211
Docket Number: No. 3D02-1507
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In