midpage

Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityBlye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

New York Court of Appeals
Jul 12, 1988
Versions:

*890 OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified not answered as unnecessary. In view of the undisputed evidence that a direct safe route to the bus was available to plaintiff, the bus company may not be held liable for plaintiff’s injuries (see, MacKenzie v Union Ry. Co., 82 App Div 124, affd 178 NY 638).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Case Details

Case Name: Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 12, 1988
Citations: 72 N.Y.2d 888; 528 N.E.2d 1225; 532 N.Y.S.2d 752; 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1674
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In