History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blumenthal v. Blumenthal
28 Del. Ch. 448
Del.
1945
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We find no substantial error in the proceedings in this case, and the decree is therefore affirmed. A restatement of the pertinent principles by another and independent opinion would result in no apparent advantage. (See ante p. 1 for opinion below.)

In addition to the authorities cited in the court’s opinion (ante p. 1, 35 A. 2d 831) some additional support may be found in Quarl v. Abbett, 102 Ind. 233, 1 N.E. 476, 52 Am. Rep. 662, and in cases listed in 126 A.L.R. 664, and 145 A.L.R. 1394.

Case Details

Case Name: Blumenthal v. Blumenthal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Feb 26, 1945
Citation: 28 Del. Ch. 448
Court Abbreviation: Del.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.