History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blumenstein v. Pilon
184 Wis. 624
Wis.
1924
Check Treatment
Owen, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a crim. con. action. Numerous errors are assigned. Some of them are not without technical merit. None of them involve novel questions of law. Their discussion would but reiterate principles well settled by the decisions of this court. The judgment is so strongly supported by the evidence that such errors as exist cannot be deemed prejudicial. We feel that their elaborate treatment will benefit no one. It would add nothing new to legal literature nor promote the interest of the parties involved.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Blumenstein v. Pilon
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 14, 1924
Citation: 184 Wis. 624
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.