74 Mich. 698 | Mich. | 1889
Eeplevin was brought against defendant for a colt belonging to the infant plaintiff. It appears by the special finding that the colt belonged to the boy, and was included in a bill of sale signed by him
It may be remarked that the printed record ■ shows neither exceptions nor assignments of error. If none was filed, there is nothing to review. But we see no error which could have been relied on.
The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.