History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blohm v. Hannan
83 N.J. Eq. 347
N.J.
1914
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons' stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisoh, Bogert, Hepreni-ieimer — 6.

For reversal — Bergen, Minturn, Vredenburgh, White — 4.

Case Details

Case Name: Blohm v. Hannan
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 8, 1914
Citation: 83 N.J. Eq. 347
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.