History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blockam v. Few
17 Ga. App. 440
Ga. Ct. App.
1916
Check Treatment
Broyles, J.

1: Under the repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court the refusal of a trial judge to direct a verdict is never reversible error.

2. The fifth, sixth, seventh, ninth, and tenth grounds of the amendment to . the motion for a new trial contain no specific assignment of error, and merely amplify the general grounds.

, 3. The eighth ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, which complains of a charge of the court, does not point out the error in the charge, and is set out in such a vague and confused manner as to present no question for determination.

4. There was some evidence to authorize the verdict, and it has been approved by the trial judge. Judgment aprmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Blockam v. Few
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 7, 1916
Citation: 17 Ga. App. 440
Docket Number: 6376
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.