History
  • No items yet
midpage
Block v. Farley
143 Misc. 785
N.Y. App. Term.
1932
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

While, ordinarily, the United States courts are courts of limited jurisdiction they are given exclusive jurisdiction in bankruptcy and, therefore, their orders and judgments possess all the incidents and qualities of finality of courts of general jurisdiction in such matters. (Sabin v. Larkin-Green Logging Co., 218 Fed. 984.) In the instant case it appeared on the face of the order discharging the prisoner that it was made in bankruptcy proceedings, which was the fact. Therefore, the ministerial officer was protected in obeying the order of discharge. {Levy v. Melody, 50 Misc. 509.)

Order modified to the extent of denying the motion to dismiss the first separate defense, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untekmyer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Block v. Farley
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: May 12, 1932
Citation: 143 Misc. 785
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.