midpage

Bliss v. StateBliss v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 2, 1987
CR 85-194
Versions:
Per Curiam.

Petitioners request permission to seek post-conviction relief, alleging that they were convicted of rape and illegally sentenced under Act 620 of 1981, which went into effect after the commission of the offense. Our review of the record reflects petitioners are in error. The jury was given instructions and verdict forms showing the correct range of punishment — five to fifty years or life — provided in Act 280 of 1975, which was in effect when the crime was committed. Accordingly, we deny the petition.

Case Details

Case Name: Bliss v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Feb 2, 1987
Citations: 723 S.W.2d 1; 291 Ark. 184; CR 85-194
Docket Number: CR 85-194
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
Log In