History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blek Co. v. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co.
18 F.2d 191
D.C. Cir.
1927
Check Treatment
ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the tribunals of the Patent Office, in a trade-mark interference proceeding, refusing registration to the appellant.

Long prior to the adoption by appellant of the mark consisting of the words “Red Dot,” with a circular spot between, for use on men’s, boy’s, children’s, and women’s garters, appellee had widely used a similar mark on rubber boots, overshoes, woolen boots, and socks. The Patent Office found, and we concur in the finding, that the use of deceptively similar marks on socks and garters would be likely to cause confusion in trade and mislead purchasers. Wolf & Sons v. Lord & Taylor, 41 App. D. C. 514.

The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Blek Co. v. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Mar 7, 1927
Citation: 18 F.2d 191
Docket Number: No. 1911
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In