History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blase v. Van Schaick
246 A.D. 887
N.Y. App. Div.
1936
Check Treatment

Review by certiorari of determination of New York State Superintendent of Insurance suspending petitioner’s broker’s license and refusing his application for renewal and refusing to grant certain agency applications. The petitioner was charged with having failed to transmit money timely to certain insurance companies, to have become deeply indebted for money borrowed with no acceptable explanation therefor, with having failed to list assets in a bankruptcy proceeding, with having violated his agreement for the sale of Ms insurance business, good will and expirations, with having loaned his credit by way of cheeks and then having stopped payment on the checks and keeping the money when repaid to him. Determination confirmed, with fifty dollars costs. Hill, P. J., MeHamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., dissent and vote to annul the determination on the ground that the order made by the Superintendent of Insurance was capricious and arbitrary.

Case Details

Case Name: Blase v. Van Schaick
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1936
Citation: 246 A.D. 887
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.