History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blankenship v. State
282 S.E.2d 719
Ga. Ct. App.
1981
Check Treatment
Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals on the general grounds his conviction of the offense of robbery. We affirm.

The victim of the robbery identified defendant as the perpetrator of the offense charged. Although the evidence presented against defendant was not overwhelming, it was nevertheless sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560)

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Blankenship v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 25, 1981
Citation: 282 S.E.2d 719
Docket Number: 62025
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.