1 Or. 328 | Or. | 1860
The errors assigned in this case are—First. That the court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiffs to amend the verification to the original complaint. Second. That the court erred in dismissing the appeal.
As to the first ground of error alleged, we think the matter of allowing amendments to a verification, either in form or substance, rests in the sound discretion of the Circuit Court, and is not subject to the revision of this court.
As to the second ground of error: It is insisted by the plaintiffs, that the verification is sufficient without amendment, and that plaintiffs had a perfect case, which the court was bound to entertain.
In considering the matter, as to whether the court below ought to have entertained jurisdiction of the case, two questions present themselves. First. Does an appeal lie from a judgment of dismissal, and for costs in the County Court? Second. Was there a sufficient verification to the original complaint ? The first question depends on the construction of the various statutes on the subject of appeal. Section 11 of the act organizing the County Court, and defining its jurisdiction, provides, that “ An appeal shall lie from such County Court in all cases to the Circuit Court.” This provision is very comprehensive, and, unless limited by some other statute, would seem clearly to indicate that every decision or judgment of the County Court can be taken to the Circuit Court by appeal. It is said, however, that by the 23d section of the act organizing the County Court, the proceedings of the County Courts are made to conform to the practice in courts of justices of the
Judgment affirmed.