History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blake v. Wheaton
3 N.C. 109
Sup. Ct. N.C.
1799
Check Treatment
Per curiam.

We rriav consider this paper as an authority op-power given by both partners to Wfaeadim, to draw on the partnership effects in favor of some third person ; and as an engagement of the partners, that it shall be paid, which is an acceptance ; and then it is an order di-awn by Wheafbn and accepted by himself and partner in favor of the plaintiffs, which is a-valid-contract. It is not unusual for partners to draw, payable to themselves or their order; 2 Doug. 653 : and lor one or both-to endorse to some third person, then why not two promise to pay to the order of one i

Judgment for the plaintiffs.,

Case Details

Case Name: Blake v. Wheaton
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 15, 1799
Citation: 3 N.C. 109
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.