Blake v. City of Pleasantville

89 N.J.L. 358 | N.J. | 1916

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice ICalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Terhune, Heppen-HEIMER, JJ. 8.

For reversal—Black, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 3.'