History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blair v. Reading
96 Ill. 130
Ill.
1880
Check Treatment
Craig, J.:

We do not understand it to be the duty of the plaintiff in error to file his abstracts and briefs, unless the other party is in court. The plaintiff was present in court on the day the cause was called, and had no notice, or any evidence that there had been any service. Under the circumstances the plaintiff in error can not be considered as in default by reason of not having filed his abstracts and briefs.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Blair v. Reading
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1880
Citation: 96 Ill. 130
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.