History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blackwell v. Pendergast
132 Ind. 550
Ind.
1892
Check Treatment
Miller, J.

— This action was instituted by the appellee against the appellants upon a promissory note and for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The complaint avers that copies of the note and mortgage are made parts of the complaint, but no copy of either instrument appears in the record.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, the demurrer was overruled and excepted to, and this ruling is properly assigned as error in this court.

The statute, section 362, R. S. 1881, which requires a copy, or the original, of an instrument of writing upon which a pleading is founded to be filed with the pleading is imperative, and where a pleading avers that a copy is filed but no copy is found in the record, the pleading will not be good as against a demurrer. Old v. Mohler, 122 Ind. 594; Overly v. Tipton, 68 Ind. 410; Brown v. State, ex rel., 44 Ind. 222; Ashley v. Foreman, 85 Ind. 55; Douglass v. Keehn, 71 Ind. 97; Montgomery v. Gorrell, 51 Ind. 309; Seawright v. Coffman, 24 Ind. 414.

The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Blackwell v. Pendergast
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 4, 1892
Citation: 132 Ind. 550
Docket Number: No. 15,984
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.