History
  • No items yet
midpage
Blackman v. State
102 So. 147
Ala. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment

The fact that when defendant and state's witness were schoolboys they had lots of fights, and defendant "sort of" got the better of witness, is too remote upon which to base ill feeling and prejudice, unless there were connecting facts showing a continuance of the youthful differences. Besides, the details of such fights would be inadmissible.

The fact that McGowan, the deputy, who was a witness examined by the state, was or was not entitled to a fee of $50 in this case could not have injuriously affected defendant's case. This witness did not testify to any fact tending to connect defendant with the manufacture of whisky.

The other exceptions are without merit.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Blackman v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 19, 1924
Citation: 102 So. 147
Docket Number: 4 Div. 996.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.