Blackman v. Garrett

Oct 11, 1910
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Fish
Fish, C. J.

Where a bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of an interlocutory injunction, and it appears therefrom that ‍​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‍certain documentary and vital evidence was introduced upon the hearing, and such *227evidence is neither incorporated in the bill nor referred to therein and attached thereto as an exhibit properly authenticated, and no brief of the evidence has been ‍​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‍approved and filed so as to become a part of the record, but such documentary evidence is merely specified by the excepting party as a part of the record to be sent up to this court by the ‍​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‍clerk of the trial court, the judgment will be affirmed, as without such evidence this court can not determine the question whether-the judge erred in refusing the injunction; and the same, not being a part of the record ‍​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‍in the case, can not be specified and sent up to this court as such. Askew v. Hogansville Cotton Oil Co., 126 Ga. 807 (55 S. E. 921) ; Edmondson v. Edmondson, 128 Ga. 53 (57 S. E. 308) ; Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642 (66 S. E. 938), and cases cited.

October 11, ‍​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‍1910. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Edwards. Haralson superior court. December 11, 1909. M. J. Head, for plaintiffs. Griffith & Matthews, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.