235 N.E.2d 142 | Ohio Ct. App. | 1968
It is the opinion of this court that the language contained in division (M) of Section
In the case at bar, our attention has been called to extrinsic facts which, it is claimed, tend to sustain the constitutionality of division (M) of Section
In the case at bar, according to the language of the statute, a Board of County Commissioners could run hog wild and, "by ordinance or resolution make any rule, or act in any matter notspecifically prohibited by general law." This is not only delegation, it is abdication of legislative power.
Judgment affirmed.
HILDEBRANT, J., concurs.