16180 | Ga. Ct. App. | Apr 15, 1925

Broyles, O. J.

1. Under all the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, the overruling of the certiorari was not error.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed,

hulee and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.