History
  • No items yet
midpage
Black v. Tompkins
39 S.W. 553
Ark.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The question of law involved in this action was decided in Reeve v. Ladies' Building Association, 56 Ark. 335, and Taylor v. Van Buren Building Association, ib. 340. According to the opinion in those cases, there was and is no usury in the contracts sued on.

The decree of the chancery court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to the court to foreclose the mortgage sued on; ascertaining the amount due thereon according to the rule stated in Roberts v. American Building & Loan Association, 62 Ark. 572.

Case Details

Case Name: Black v. Tompkins
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Feb 27, 1897
Citation: 39 S.W. 553
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.