History
  • No items yet
midpage
Biwer v. Van Dorn
179 P. 953
Idaho
1919
Check Treatment
BUDGE, J.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the seizure and retention by appellants, under a writ of attachment, of an automobile owned by respondent, and to restrain appellants from selling or disposing of it or in any way interfering with respondent’s possession thereof.

Upon a motion made therefor, the court entered an order restraining appellants as prayed, until the final hearing of said cause upon the merits. This appeal is from the order granting the injunction.

*214The transcript on appeal does not contain a certificate either by the trial judge, clerk or attorneys, that the papers therein contained constitute all of the records, papers and files used or considered by the trial judge upon the hearing of the motion for the injunction, as required by C. L., sec. 4821, and Rule 24 of this court. It is the settled' law in this jurisdiction that where the transcript does not contain such certificate, the appeal will be dismissed. (Walsh v. Niess, 30 Ida. 325, 164 Pac. 528, where the previous authorities are collected; Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor M. Co., 30 Ida. 719, 167 Pac. 1163; Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor M. Co., 30 Ida. 727, 167 Pac. 1163.)

The appeal is dismissed. Costs are awarded to respondent.

Morgan, C. J., and Rice, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Biwer v. Van Dorn
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 31, 1919
Citation: 179 P. 953
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.