Birthisel v. Birthisel
520 So. 2d 317 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1988
In expressing our decision to reverse the trial court’s order terminating child support and finding that the ex-wife is indebted to the former husband in the amount of $2000.00, it is not necessary that we recount the underlying facts. The record before us will neither support the trial court's conclusion that the children were emancipated nor sustain the ex-husband’s entitlement to the recoupment of child support payments made during periods when the children resided with him. See Fileger v. Fileger, 478 So.2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Raybuck v. Raybuck, 451 So.2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
