History
  • No items yet
midpage
Birmberg v. Isquith
126 Misc. 584
N.Y. App. Term.
1926
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The identical motion having previously been denied by a justice of the New York City Municipal Court without leave to renew it could not be brought on again. (Goldenberg v. Adler, 123 N. Y. Supp. 387.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Birmberg v. Isquith
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 8, 1926
Citation: 126 Misc. 584
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.