History
  • No items yet
midpage
Birch Wathen Lenox School v. Butler Rogers Baskett, P.C.
806 N.Y.S.2d 872
N.Y. App. Div.
2006
Check Treatment

THE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL, Appellant, v BUTLER ROGERS BASKETT, P.C., Respondent, et al., Defendant. (And Another Action.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York

2005

806 NYS2d 872

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered June 10, 2005, which granted defendant Butler Rogers Baskett‘s motion to preclude plaintiff from amending its expert disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action alleging architect malpractice, the motion court properly denied leave to amend to add an additional theory of damages in light of, inter alia, plaintiff‘s prolonged resistance to disclosure regarding such damages and the fact that the amendment was sought virtually on the eve of trial (cf. Lissak v Cerabona, 10 AD3d 308 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Birch Wathen Lenox School v. Butler Rogers Baskett, P.C.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 17, 2006
Citation: 806 N.Y.S.2d 872
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In