*1 guilty, was at which time the man who statements, inculpatory al- he made rehearing en of for banc On Petition though attempting on defend himself to 102; Cir., Cir., 5 F.2d 385 F.2d 5 393 Also, ground re- the the of self-defense. permit 932. to custodial officers of the fusal gave parents he him before his to visit Moore, Jr., Montgomery, William B. very bring case second confession the Ala., the appellant. for in announced close to the circumstances Atty. Clark, Gen., David W. Asst. Supreme in the recent Court decision Montgomery, Ala., appellee. for 346, Connecticut, 88 U.S. 391 Darwin v. BROWN, Before JOHN Chief R. However, 1488, 630. S.Ct. 20 L.Ed.2d GEWIN, Judge TUTTLE, WISDOM, and feeling the my principal for that reason COLEMAN, THORNBERRY, BELL new for a set aside conviction should be AINSWORTH, GOLDBERG, GOD- assigned by Har- Mr. Justice trial is that BOLD, DYER, and SIMPSON CLAY- Here, clear it is lan in his concurrence. TON, Judges. Circuit beyond held that what has been doubt by legal obtained confession was to abe PER CURIAM. calling ac- repeatedly the officers the had he the fact that cused’s attention to A member of in active serv- the Court damaging sufficiently already made having requested poll ap- a ice on the merely they wanted plication rehearing ma- and a en banc that for and statements details. him to fill in the jority Judges of active service hav- the .in
Billy Don Franklin Boulden v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison, Montgomery, Alabama
395 F.2d 169
5th Cir.1968Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.