*1 762 12) Petition Fifth Rule the Circuit
Local Banc denied. Rehearing is also for F~ al., Billy D. COOK et Plaintiffs-Appellants, BROWN, and Judge, Before Chief v. WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORN- BERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, HUDSON, al., etc., et Robert W. DYER, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, Defendants-Appellees. SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY No. 74-1038. GEE, Judges. and Circuit Appeals, Court of United States CLARK, Judge, whom Circuit with Fifth Circuit. THORNBERRY, Judges Circuit AINS- 3, July 1975. WORTH, GEE, (dis- join and SIMPSON
senting).
When it appeared my writing would express panel, the particu- views of the explicate care was lar taken to docu- and ment what was said because it seemed absolutely necessary cogently to rein- FOR REHEARING ON PETITION rights trampled by state the core the FOR AND PETITION REHEAR- arbitrary school district’s edict of forced EN BANC ING conformity private in a citizen’s life. 1975, 1975, Cir., 21, April 5 (Opinion That endeavor failed to muster a concur- 744) F.2d 511 Now, Court, by rence. the full the albeit possible, narrowest margin has declined RO- COLEMAN, and CLARK Before rehear the cause en to banc. NEY, Judges. Circuit Respectfully, I insist panel that the PER CURIAM: (1) is contrary decision to Supreme Court (2) precedent, an error exception- and of Rehearing is denied for The Petition importance. My having al best effort the at polled having been the Court and expended panel dissent, been in the a the the of of members one request of attempt explanation further at appears the Circuit majority of a and Court For futile. ed, the reasons previously stat- regular active service in Judges who are 35, I dissent from the court’s denial of it, (Rule in favor of having voted not rehearing Procedure; en banc. Appellate of Rules Federal