midpage

Bikman v. 595 Broadway AssociatesBikman v. 595 Broadway Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 4, 2011
Versions:88 A.D.3d 455
930 N.Y.S.2d 435
930 N.Y.2d 435

Plaintiff cannot show a meritorious cause of action, as required to vacate her default, because her claims have been fully litigated in prior proceedings and the doctrine of res judicata bars her from relitigating them (see O‘Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]). Furthermore, given plaintiff‘s history of frivolous litigation, the court properly enjoined her from bringing any further actions against defendant relating to these claims without court approval (see e.g. Matter of Sud v Sud, 227 AD2d 319 [1996]).

We have reviewed plaintiff‘s remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30118(U).]

Case Details

Case Name: Bikman v. 595 Broadway Associates
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 4, 2011
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 455; 930 N.Y.S.2d 435; 930 N.Y.2d 435
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In