619 N.Y.S.2d 905 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1994
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured while testing an electrical "cabinet.” He alleged that defendants should have warned of the dangers of
The IAS Court properly granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. There is "no necessity to warn a customer already aware—through common knowledge or learning—of a specific hazard” and, in the proper case, the court can decide as a matter of law that there is no duty to warn or that the duty has been discharged (Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v Northern Propane Gas Co., 75 AD2d 55, 65; see, Alessandrini v Weyerhauser Co., 207 AD2d 996; Wolfgruber v Upjohn Co., 72 AD2d 59, 62, affd 52 NY2d 768). Plaintiff, an electronics technician, was a "knowledgeable user” of the connector plug, and thus there was no duty to warn. In any event, it is undisputed that plaintiffs employer had wired the connector plug and attached it to the cabinet in accordance with either its own or military specifications, and plaintiffs fellow employee testified that any instructions from defendants would have been ignored. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present —Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.