History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bigner v. Hodges
82 Miss. 215
Miss.
1903
Check Treatment
Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion, of the court.

It is questionable whether any amendment of the declaration was needed, but, if it was, theĀ” allowance of it was proper. We think there was no material variance between the allegata and probata. The words are practically synonymous.

' The doctrine of privileged communications cannot afford shelter. The mayor and the marshal were not the only persons to whom the words were spoken, and, even as to them, the defendant himself testified that he met them casually and made his statement to them. It is difficult to believe that it was for the public good he designed the communication. The jury did not believe that it was, and the verdict for $150 is not excessive.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bigner v. Hodges
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1903
Citation: 82 Miss. 215
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.