Bigham v. Yundt

Jul 19, 1924
No. 4314
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Gilbert
Gilbert, J.

1. “This court will in ho case undertake to pass upon questions ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍presented by a bill of exceptions, when it affirmatively appears that, even if the judgment of the court below were reversed, the plaintiff in error ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍would derive no benefit from the adjudication.”

2. It appearing that since the refusal of the injunction prayed for in the court below, no supersedeas having ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍been applied for or granted, the defendant has done all that was sought to be enjoined, the writ of error will be dismissed without prejudice. Davis v. Mayor &c. ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍of Jasper, 119 Ga. 57 (45 S. E. 724); Henderson v. Hoppe, 103 Ga. 684, 686 (30 S. E. 653); Fletcher v. Harper, 135 Ga. 404 (69 S. E. 562); Tabor v. Hipp, 136 Ga. 124 (70 S. E. 886, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 246); Clements v. Wilkerson, 151 Ga. 467 (107 ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍S. E. 47); Clower v. Langley, 153 Ga. 154 (111 S. E. 563). Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.