History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bigham v. State
679 So. 2d 1253
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Allen Bigham appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Ride of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) claiming that he received insufficient presentence jail time credit. Bigham received twenty days of jail credit when he was sentenced on October 4,. 1993. Although Bigham claims that he was “officially charged” while in jail on August 12, 1993, and should receive jail credit from that date, the trial court found that he was initially incarcerated on September 15, 1993, and only entitled to twenty days of jail credit. From the limited record before this court, we are unable to confirm the findings set forth in the trial court’s order, which does not include any record attachments.

We reverse because the trial court did not attach portions of the record conclusively showing that Bigham is entitled to no relief. On remand, if the trial court denies the motion again, it shall attach those documents that conclusively refute the jail credit claim. Bigham must seek appellate review of that order within thirty days.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bigham v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 13, 1996
Citation: 679 So. 2d 1253
Docket Number: No. 96-02077
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.