History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bigham v. Chamlee
148 Ga. 488
Ga.
1918
Check Treatment
Hill, J.

This was an equity suit, and the plaintiff in order to obtain equity must do equity. The trial judge was authorized to find from the evidence that there was no tender by the plaintiff of the principal, interest, and costs due on the fi. fa.; and even if it be conceded that the judgment for the attorney’s fees was void, the- judge did not err in refusing an injunction against Chamlee and the sheriff, because the plaintiff did not offer to do equity by making the tender above referred to. -Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. The ease was submitted on affidavits and argument of counsel, after which the court restrained the defendant Eobertson until further order, -but refused an injunction against Chamblee and the sheriff; and the plaintiff excepted. F. A. Hooper, for plaintiff. B. N. Hardeman, for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Bigham v. Chamlee
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 17, 1918
Citation: 148 Ga. 488
Docket Number: No. 846
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.