Bielecki v. Max Hertz Leather Co.
131 A. 921 | N.J. | 1926
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. *433 For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
