| Ind. | Nov 15, 1877
Suit by the appellant, as administrator, against the appellee, on an account.
Answer: denial and payment. Trial by the court, and finding for the appellant, ninety-one dollars and twenty cents. He thought this was not enough, and therefore prepared his case and appealed to this court.
The first thing that the appellant complains of is the refusal of the court to allow him to prove the value of certain articles in his account filed with his complaint. The evidence proves that the appellee bought the articles at a sale for a specified bid. This fact shows that the articles were purchased at an agreed price. Their value was not in question. But the ground upon which the appellant thinks he had a right to make such proof is, that the appellee did not comply with the terms of the sale, by giving his note. This will make no difference m the price. He was not bound to give more than he agreed, by his bid, to give, and the amount that the appellant, by the sale, agreed to take, whether he gave his note to the appellant or not. The bid and its acceptance fixed the price of the articles, by which they were both bound.
The second matter of complaint is, that the finding is too small in amount; and this depends upon the
The fourth point presented is the error in refusing to grant a new trial; and, by way of argument, the appellant, by his counsel, says:
“ If the positions above assumed and contended for are tenable, the appellant is clearly' entitled to a new trial, and nothing additional heed be alleged under this assignment.”
As we have seen that the positions he has taken above are not tenable, it is clear that he is not entitled to a new trial.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Petition for a rehearing overruled.