228 P. 861 | Cal. | 1924
This application for a writ of prohibition presents for decision the single question of the jurisdiction of the superior court to issue an interim restraining order without requiring the undertaking mentioned in section
"Under either section, pending the application and before hearing the parties on the order to show cause, the defendant may be restrained. It would be the better practice, and certainly is the general practice, to require an undertaking during such temporary restraining order." In Maier v. Luce,
The petition is denied.