midpage

Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court
Dec 5, 2012
2012-1283
Versions:

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal and cross-appeal are accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hewitt v. L.E. Myers, 134 Ohio St.3d 199, 2012-Ohio-5317, 981 N.E.2d 795, and judgment is entered in favor of Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., Marc G. Williams-Young, and Elaine B. Szuch, for appellees and cross-appellants, Thomas H. Beyer and Sherry Beyer.

Weston Hurd, L.L.P., Shawn W. Maestle, and Jeffrey L. Tasse, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 5, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 5627; 134 Ohio St. 3d 379; 982 N.E.2d 708; 2012-1283
Docket Number: 2012-1283
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In