History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bevins v. Iowa
51 S. Ct. 216
SCOTUS
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 501. (2) Huntington v. Worthen; Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97, 102.

Case Details

Case Name: Bevins v. Iowa
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 2, 1931
Citation: 51 S. Ct. 216
Docket Number: No. 574
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.