Bevins v. Iowa
282 U.S. 815
SCOTUS
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 501. (2) Huntington v. Worthen; Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97, 102.