midpage

Beutler v. MaynardBeutler v. Maynard

New York Court of Appeals
Mar 25, 1982
Versions:56 N.Y.2d 538
434 N.E.2d 1344
449 N.Y.S.2d 966
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3223

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The factual determinations made by the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and we find no error in that court’s application of the pertinent rules of law. Respondents Susanne M. Beutler and Martha Randazzo demonstrated their entitlement by prescription to free access to and use of the right of way known as Linwood Drive Extension.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Beutler v. Maynard
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 25, 1982
Citations: 56 N.Y.2d 538; 434 N.E.2d 1344; 449 N.Y.S.2d 966; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3223
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In