History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beutler v. Maynard
56 N.Y.2d 538
NY
1982
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The factual determinations made by the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and we find no error in that court’s application of the pertinent rules of law. Respondents Susanne M. Beutler and Martha Randazzo demonstrated their entitlement by prescription to free access to and use of the right of way known as Linwood Drive Extension.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Beutler v. Maynard
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 25, 1982
Citation: 56 N.Y.2d 538
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.