History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bethel v. Leay
14 Iowa 592
Iowa
1863
Check Treatment

The decision of the court was announced by —

Baldwin, C. J.

The error assigned is that the service of the original notice was not in the manner directed by the statute. This error, *593we think, could have been corrected upon motion in the court below. See Revision of 1860, § 3545. The appeal is, therefore,

Seevers & Williams for the appellant — Limdley for the appellee.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bethel v. Leay
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Dec 3, 1863
Citation: 14 Iowa 592
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.