midpage

Bertrand v. TaylorBertrand v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 18, 1947
1 Div. 287.
Reporters:
,
Before:
Foster
FOSTER, Justice.

The only feature of the record which is thought to be a judgment from ‍​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍which the appeal was taken is a memorandum which is presumably a docket entry as follows: “2/4/47. Demurrer overruled.”

Such an entry is not a decree in equity as it would ‍​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍not be a judgment at law, which will support an appeal. Mann v. Hyams, 101 Ala. 431, 13 So. 681. Many cases are cited in 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, 123: later ‍​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍cases are Wilbanks v. Mitchell, 239 Ala. 167, 194 So. 513; Watkins Co. v. Goggans, 242 Ala. 222, 5 So.2d 472.

If the entry was completed on the minutes of the court, or if ‍​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍the judge “formulated and formally rendered” a decree, it does not appear in this record. See Lanier v. Russell, 74 Ala. 364, 367.

It is necessary to dismiss the appeal because there ‍​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍is no decree to support it.

Appeal dismissed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bertrand v. Taylor
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 18, 1947
Citations: 32 So. 2d 885; 250 Ala. 15; 1 Div. 287.
Docket Number: 1 Div. 287.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In