History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bertman v. Zfour, Inc.
661 So. 2d 423
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1995
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant Bertman’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint on jurisdictional grounds. This af-firmance is without prejudice to defendant Bertman’s renewing his motion to dismiss should discovery yield evidence sufficient to establish lack of personal jurisdiction over him. See Venetian Salami Co: v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989); Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Scott, 545 So.2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bertman v. Zfour, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 18, 1995
Citation: 661 So. 2d 423
Docket Number: No. 95-1374
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.